£20,000 fine for asbestos failings
A leisure facility was accused of treating asbestos removal as a “DIY project”, exposing staff and members of the public to this hazardous substance. How did they get the job so wrong?

Two employees of a leisure centre were tasked with pulling out fixtures in a disused plant room ahead of a conversion. No asbestos survey was carried out, and the two used angle grinders and hammers to pull out pipework and lagging and a wheelbarrow to transport it through the building to a skip outside. They were not wearing protective masks or clothing. After carrying out this work for a couple of days, a friend of one of the employees alerted them that the material in the skip may be hazardous. Environmental consultants were brought in and confirmed that they were asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), which must only be removed by licensed contractors.
The local Council investigated and found that the company had no plan for the works. It just allowed the employees, who had no knowledge or training in how to deal with asbestos, to go about it in an ad hoc fashion. They were not supplied with PPE. After a day, one of the employees started using his own mask because he was “feeling rough” due to the dust. As well as the ACMs in the skip, investigators found remnants in the plant room and along the route used to transport it through the building.
The court heard that members of the public could have been exposed to asbestos fibres, in addition to the two employees who carried out the work.the leisure centre pleaded guilty to breaching its duty under ss.2(1) and 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of its employees and others affected by its activities. It was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay over £5,000 in costs.
Related Topics
-
HMRC has withdrawn Form 652. How should you notify VAT errors going forward?
-
Can paying interest to your company save tax?
You recently borrowed a substantial sum of money from your company rather than take extra salary or dividends. Your bookkeeper says it might be more tax efficient if your company charged you interest. This sounds counter-intuitive but is it correct?
-
Reverse charge and end user rules: opportunity?
If you sell construction services to other builders, you need to consider the domestic reverse charge rules. You must apply these where your customer is an end user. How might this create a cash-flow advantage?