Who pays for the time it takes to do a coronavirus lateral flow test?
The government has confirmed that dozens of public and private sector employers have joined its scheme to offer workplace rapid testing to employees without coronavirus symptoms who cannot work from home. These lateral flow tests give results in 30 minutes. However, who pays for the waiting time?

Where workplace rapid testing has been implemented employees will be asked to take a lateral flow test a couple of times a week. They then need to wait 30 minutes for their result, and normally they wouldn’t start work until that result is available. It’s highly unlikely the employer will have explicitly covered this type of waiting time in employment contracts. If that’s the case and they can’t otherwise contractually require employees to work overtime, then they should allow them to attend for lateral flow tests and wait for their results during their normal working hours, e.g. at the start of their shift rather than pre-shift, unless they expressly agree to come in earlier. If the employer can contractually require employees to work overtime, and wants them to come in pre-shift to do the test and wait for the results under those overtime provisions, then they should pay for any additional time here in accordance with those provisions (or grant time off in lieu if the employer allows for that). Likewise, if the employees expressly consent to come in pre-shift, the employer should agree to pay them to do so (or again agree time off in lieu), although they don’t have to agree to higher overtime rates.
Where contractual overtime is unpaid, which is frequently the case with salaried employees, employers need to be careful to ensure compliance with national minimum wage (NMW) legislation, particularly if the employee is paid at or close to NMW rates. This is because standby time at or near the workplace and overtime both count as working time for NMW purposes. Once a salaried hours worker who isn’t paid for these additional standby or overtime hours has worked for more than their basic annual hours in the year, it’s necessary to check that all the additional hours are taken into account when checking that at least the NMW rates have been paid. This shouldn’t affect anyone who is paid significantly in excess of NMW rates though.
Related Topics
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
-
How to handle workers aiming to "Slide Away" to an Oasis Concert
The Oasis Live ’25 UK reunion tour starts in Cardiff on 4 July 2025 and concludes in London on 28 September 2025. With ticketless fans keen on obtaining last-minute tickets and ticketed fans eager to get to the gig for when the gates open, this could have an impact on staff productivity and timekeeping. How can you tackle these issues?
-
Is getting your business to pay tax efficient?
You were recently involved in an online discussion about the tax consequences of putting the cost of a celebratory meal for the business owners and staff through the firm’s books. Will doing so save or increase tax overall?