Can you claw back enhanced maternity/adoption pay?
If you agree to pay more than the statutory minimum during maternity/adoption leave, can you ask an employee to sign an agreement under which they agree to pay back the enhancement in certain circumstances?
Most small employers pay statutory maternity pay (SMP) or statutory adoption pay (SAP) only during maternity/adoption leave. However, you can agree to pay more than this. If you do offer enhanced maternity/adoption pay, you can require the employee to repay some or all of the enhanced amount, i.e. anything more than SMP/SAP, if they do not return to work either at all or for a minimum period of time after their leave ends.
To do this, you must either include suitable repayment wording in their employment contract (if enhanced pay is a contractual right) or ask them to sign a clawback agreement governing the repayment terms in advance of their leave starting (if enhanced pay is discretionary). Your wording may state, e.g. that the enhanced pay element is repayable should the employee either not return to work at all after their leave or not return for a minimum period, e.g. six months. To be reasonable, you could limit repayment to apply only where the employee resigns, and provide for pro rata repayment based on the length of return to work. SMP/SAP cannot be clawed back under any circumstances. You should also provide in the contract/agreement for the owed amount to be deducted from the employee’s outstanding wages (if there are any), with any outstanding balance remaining then to be repayable by them within, say, one month of employment termination.
Related Topics
-
Should you voluntarily payroll benefits in kind?
The window to sign up to voluntarily payroll non-mandatory benefits in kind for 2027/28 will open in November. Is it worth volunteering to pay HMRC earlier than required or should you wait until it becomes mandatory in 2028/29?
-
Wise tax statement errors could affect 4,000 customers
Around 4,000 UK customers of financial services provider Wise have been told that tax statements issued between 2021 and 2025 contained incorrect figures. The errors could have resulted in taxpayers paying too much or too little income tax and capital gains tax (CGT). What should affected customers check?
-
CT61